Copyright Law and University Policy

The pressures of donnish success buns be overwhelming to the conscientious student. Children atomic number 18 ingrained from the earliest ages that each test score will decide their future.The idea of the permanent cross-file looms over them at every academic turn, and this pressure leads directly to the dislodgeing by some to cheat. According to a study by the rivet for Academic Integrity, it was reported that more than 70 percent of high inculcate students in the United States admitted to serious rig in 2005 (Paulos, 2007, p. 11).This staggering numerate is evidence that academic dishonesty is not a fuss relegated to a few bad apples, unless if it is a widespread epidemic that deserves hand-to-hand analysis. After all, three out of four U.S. high school students tricknot be bad students without regard for academic success.Quite to the contrary, many of these students who cheat do so because they do care about their academic success and often find themselves strugglin g to consider the grades, rather than learn the material. Even more than the point that students cheat, is the design of the educational system that puts measuring education above providing one. But, the problem is not an easy one to remedy, especially with all the new methods of cheating available to students.However, regulations exist not only at the national level, but also at the university level, as facsimileright laws and academic integrity policies make copying the make water of another a serious offense the only difference between the two is that copyright law seeks to protect the work of its creator for financial reasons, while academic integrity policies are near often designed simply to dissuade or punish students that copy the work of others.Technology has taking cheating to a level previously nameless in education. The Internet offers students the ability to copy and paste information into a paper, whether a phrase, a paragraph, or a doctoral thesis.While some stu dents are aware that they are plagiarizing, there are equal amounts that simply do not understand the rules of plagiarism. According to author Sean Price, the rules of plagiarism are not always clear-cut Many younger writers make this mistake because they take ont understand plagiarisms ground rules.And learning these rules can be confusing Its OK to borrow a well-known(a) phrase, like To be or not to be and not summons its antecedent. Someone could start a story with, To be or not to be on the swim team. Thats simply putting a twist on a famous line, not pretending its yours (Price, 2005, p. 17). Some students also borrow too heavily from a source without meaning to, but ignorance is not an acceptable excuse for lack of academic integrity.And, for every student who plagiarizes accidentally, there are many more who do so intentionally. For both the unintentional copiers and the deliberate plagiarists, academic policies such as those employed at UMUC attempt to illuminate what is acceptable and what is not.