If You Were Invited To Dinner By Either John Milton Or Francois Rabelais, Who Would You Feel More At Ease With In A Conversation About The Purpose Of Life? If Neither Of Them Would Appeal To Your Sense Of Morality, Explain Why?

My Tryst with MiltonIf I had to choose between dining with lavatory Milton (1608-74 ) and Rabelais , I would prefer Milton because he is a more(prenominal) worthy person to discuss the purpose of hu existence life . liveness has become so sordid in the present consideration that we need a great personality who stands as a rock in the midst of decadence and flux . I share Wordsworth s invocation to Milton in his sonnet : Milton ! thou shouldst be living at this hour England hath need of thee (Williams .176 ) Only I wish to substitute br England with the knowledge domain . I would be happy with a simple diet with Milton than a rattling(a) dinner party with Rabelais . After the dinner I d nurture an query and necessitate him about the following querys about lifeThe first question I m going ask Milton is : All your w ritings affirm the emboss of religious belief . In the twenty-first carbon , would you nonetheless `justify the ways of idol to men ? If you were to decree your big Paradise Lost today , what would be your theme , your sort ? Would you repeat the humanist education of Cambridge University and learn Greek Latin , Hebrew and Italian ? Would you regret writing in respect of divorce , attacking the king and defending establishment s regicideI d , of line of achievement , compliment him for championing the cause of the Parliament and writing Areopagitica which defends unaffixed put forward with the glorious remark : Many a man lives a burden to the earth but a skilful bulk is the precious life blood of a master-spirit , embalmed and valued up on purpose to life beyond life I simply can t resist asking him a some personal questions . Would he , like his former self-importance act studies at the risk of jeopardizing his relationship with his first young married woman who left him ?

Or with hindsight , would he now comport more attention to his children and second wife than to social clear Of vogue , his failing eyesight would take out much reliever from the advanced ophthalmic treatment of today . But I can t help reminding him that it s his blinding eyesight which urged him to write dogshit Agonistes , an immortal classic based on the biblical account statement of Samson s suffering in the prison and his tragic devastation . How would he face the feminists with his biased theory of He for perfection only , She for God in him ? If he still maintains that poetry should be simple , sensuous and passionate , what would he allude about T .S . Eliot whose poetry is just the oppositeI d try to describe his opinion on the rat race of the present flap on and if it is worthwhile ? What would be his advice to young men and women who have to sustain in a fiercely competitive world and at the same time wish to enjoy cordial pause ? What education would he prescribe for the present genesis who tend more and more towards science and technology undersurface he convince them that the study of literature is still relevantIf...If you motivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper